list at philipgalanter.com
Tue Oct 19 07:15:18 BST 2010
I had trouble with that too. Maybe he meant that you can prove some things are either provable or falsifiable without being able to do either?
On Oct 18, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Paul Harrison wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Tom Betts <tom at nullpointer.co.uk> wrote:
>> ... You may be able to prove something is provable, without actually being able to prove it directly. ...
> I'm having a bit of trouble imagining how this might occur.
> Paul Harrison
> Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium / Monash University
> pfh at logarithmic.net
> jabber pfh at jabber.org.au
> 'No, no, no. Generative spam is more markov-based.'
> To unsubscribe from eu-gene visit
More information about the eu-gene