[eu-gene] Software / generative / whatever
michael.gogins at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 20:15:36 GMT 2012
Design is less important than art, because design depends upon and
presupposes art. Art is what creates the template for "the human
world." Design fills out the template.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Philip Galanter <list at philipgalanter.com> wrote:
> Absolutely Rob. I don't mean to be elitist in these comments at all. And for that matter I have nothing but respect for great design. It's different than art, but no less difficult or important.
> I guess the point I was making was that at this point, at least in the digital realm, the making of generative art has gotten in front of the thinking about generative art. And so more should be done to nurture criticism, theory, and history work related to generative art. What can we do to make that happen?
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
>> On 06/01/12 17:33, Marius Watz wrote:
>>> Most of the work is by enthusiasts, not artists,
>> (Generative) Art For All! :-)
>> - Rob.
>> 'In this forum this kind of thrown egg is likely to land on your own face.'
>> To unsubscribe from eu-gene visit
> 'In this forum this kind of thrown egg is likely to land on your own face.'
> To unsubscribe from eu-gene visit
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com
More information about the eu-gene